Department  of  Christian  Defense

 

"defending the faith"

 

home       about us       doctrinal statement     seminars      products      contact us


Mormonism

Jehovah's Witnesses

Oneness Theology
(Modalism) 

 

Roman Catholicism

Islam

Apologetic
 Articles
, audio, and videos

Debates

Early Church Documents

 Come join us: THEOLOGY & APOLOGETIC CLASSES,

taught by Dr Edward Dalcour


 

ministry donations


FEATURED ARTICLES

The Muslim Challenge: “Where did Jesus say, “I am God worship Me?

The "Rock" of Mathew 16:18

Roman 9:5: Jesus Christ is "God over all, blessed forever. . . ."

 

Jesus Christ Worshiped as God

 

The Carmen Christi (Phil. 2:6-11)

 

The Substance and Essence of the Son

 

John 17:5: The Pre-existent Christ 

 

Jesus Christ, the Son,
Creator of All Things

 

Corralling the New Testament Canon

 

The Trinity in the Old Testament

 

 How to Respond to Attacks on the Deity of Christ by Muslims & Jehovah’s Witnesses

 Islam & the Trinity

The Christ that Paul Preached

The Mormon (LDS) view of

Jesus Christ

 

Mormonism & Black Skin

A Concise Look at the Nature
& Duration of Hell

 

"Firstborn" & the JWs

 How to share your faith with Jehovah’s Witnesses


John 1:1 & the

Jehovah's Witnesses'

New World Translation

Irresistible Grace:
The Effectual Calling of God

The Security of the Believer: Perseverance of the Saints
 


A Word on
Substitutionary  Atonement

The cross-work of Jesus Christ does not put the elect in a potentially saved state; rather it secured salvation for the ones that the Father gave to Christ: (John 6:37-40, 44).


Christ’s death also secured reconciliation for His elect (cf. Rom. 5:10; 2 Cor. 5:18-19; Col. 1:21-22; Heb. 9:12). He voluntarily gave Himself as a ransom for His chosen, on their behalf (cf. Mark 10:45; Rom. 8:32; Gal. 1:4; 3:13; Eph. 5:25-26; 1 Thess. 5.9-10; 1 Tim. 2:6): “For He has visited us and accomplished redemption for His people” (Luke 1.68).


Note the usage of the Greek preposition huper (“on behalf of,” “instead of”) to describe the actual and literal substitutionary death of Christ: “[the Father] delivered [paredōken; i.e., delivered up for sacrifice] Him over for [huper, lit., “on behalf of”] us all” (Rom. 8:32; emphasis added); “who gave Himself for [huper] our sins” (Gal. 1:4; emphasis added; cf. 3:13); “Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for [heauton paredōken huper] her” (Eph. 5.25; emphasis added).

Further, to emphasize the nature of the substitutionary work of Christ on the behalf of His elect, the preposition anti is utilized in Mark 10:45: “For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for [lutron anti] many” and Matthew 20:28, which reads identically. After careful lexical and linguistic study, Greek scholar, Daniel Wallace, concludes:

"In summery, the evidence appears to be overwhelmingly in favor of viewing anti in Matt. 20:28/Mark 10:45 as meaning in the place of and very possibly with the secondary meaning in exchange for. . . . (GGBB, 367).

In 1 Timothy 2:6, Paul combines the compound antilutron and huper to clearly denote what Jesus Christ literally did for His people—a ransom in their place: “who gave Himself as a ransom for [antilutron huper] all.”

But because of His great love and mercy for His chosen, He not only invites them, but infallibly deliverers them: “you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins” (Matt. 1:21).

 

As Paul rightly says, “By His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor. 1.30). He literally substituted Himself on behalf of His people absorbing the wrath that was due to our account because of sin. His cross-work satisfied the requirements of God's law.

 

It was the perfect justice of God, which required that the perfect demands of the law should be met (cf. Rom. 3:25-27). Christ Jesus perfectly met those requirements by His active (preceptive) and passive (penal) obedience whereby substituting Himself in our place.  

-----------------------------------------------------

 

MISSION TRIP TO BELARUS

We need your Help
    


LDS (Mormon) missionaries at health fairs teach schoolchildren in Minsk, Belarus (formally part of the USSR) of the dangers of
smoking and other issues. More than 250,000 children saw these presentations. As with all LDS presentations, they are designed to make “new converts” of the LDS religion.

Christians in Belarus, Russia, and the surrounding countries have been seriously lacking in theological and especially apologetic material. Thus, many Christian there cannot distinguish essential Christian doctrine from the false teachings of Roman Catholicism (a major influence there) and other non-Christian cults such as Oneness Pentecostalism, Mormonism, and the Jehovah’s Witnesses. In addition, with the alarming growth rate of Islam there, it is vitally important that Christians be able to accurately communicate essential Christian doctrines such as the Trinity, the deity of Christ, and His finished work.  

This coming July, Edward Dalcour we will be teaming up with a Southern Baptist Mission association to hold public evangelical events, and specifically, training pastors and Christian leaders to more accurately affirm and defend the gospel of Jesus Christ---and providing them the necessary material to do so. 

 

We are seeking financial support for expenses. If you would like to help with this event please go here: Mission-Teaching Trip to Belarus     

       


 

The “Rock” of Matthew 16:18

 

“I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.” 

 

This passage is the so-called hallmark proof-text that Rome uses to teach that Peter was the “rock” (and thus, the first “Pope”) upon which Christ built His church. This notion also spawned other false Catholic doctrines such as the “infallibility” of the Pope when speaking, ex cathedra—“from the throne”): We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff” (Pope Boniface VIII, papal bull, Unam Sanctam, A.D. 1302; emphasis added). However, as with any text of Scripture. . . read more

 


 

Mormon Faith Confusion & Tolerance
 

 The current 12 LDS Apostles 

 

Ever since Mitt Romney became the a presidential candidate, the hot media topic these days centers on his Mormon religion, formally called, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). Unfortunately, many Christians are unfamiliar with the fundamental differences between the LDS doctrine and historic biblical Christianity. However, when Christian leaders and pastors do not understand even the central differences and thus declare the Mormon faith as a truly “Christian” faith, there is no excuse. This kind of irresponsible thinking and lack of discernment removes the evangelical necessity to the Mormon people. . . read more.


The Muslim Challenge: “Where did Jesus say, “I am God worship Me?”

Although Jesus never literally stated, "I am God," Jesus’ claims to deity were much stronger and clearer than if He had said, “I am God.” In fact, some of Jesus' claims to deity were only used of YHWH alone. The specific claims of Jesus to be equal with God were not used by nor were they applied to humans or angels, as with the term “God” --Read more

 

                                             

Arabic Broadcasting Network Presents: The Trinity in the Old Testament and the Person of the Holy Spirit

 

 

 

 

 

 


THEOLOGY & APOLOGETIC CLASSES

Come join us. We hold free on-going classes offering Christian counter-cult evangelistic instruction
held locally in Los Angeles conducted by Dr. Edward Dalcour

Every Tuesday night @ 7:40 PM

Directions

Woodland Hills Chiropractic and Medical Center
5530 Corbin Ave, Ste # 100 
Tarzana, CA 91356
Phone: 818-705-1333

*Or call us at 818-377-5272 or email us at proslogos@gmail.com

 


 

A Definitive Look at Oneness Theology:
In the Light of Biblical Trinitarianism

--by Dr. Edward L. Dalcour (North-West University, Potchefstroom, SA, 2011)

NEW EDITION: 3rd Edition, Revised, Updated, and Expanded
Adapted from Ph.D. Thesis from North West University entitled:
An Evaluation of “Oneness Theology” in the Light of the Biblical Emphasis on Trinitarianism

For those who do not have time to conduct the exegetical work  necessary to refute Oneness claims but who wish to be theologically informed or to discuss the doctrine of the Trinity with theologians in the United Pentecostal tradition, Dalcour has provided a valuable resource" "For those who do not have time to conduct the exegetical work  necessary to refute Oneness claims but who wish to be theologically informed or to discuss the doctrine of the Trinity with theologians in the United Pentecostal tradition, Dalcour has provided a valuable resource"  —John D. Laing, Professor of Systematic Theology and  Philosophy, Southwestern Theological Seminary, Harvard  School for Theological Studies (more reviews)


 Definitive Look at Oneness Theology critically examines the claims  of  Oneness theology. The new 3rd edition, which is adapted from Dr.  Edward Dalcour's Ph.D. Thesis, contains expanded and updated  material. It provides a clear and sharp exegetical refutation to chief Oneness theological assertions and presents a positive presentation of the doctrine of the Trinity--  READ MORE

                           

Oneness Pentecostals and other Oneness (i.e., “Jesus Only”) groups make up one of the largest and fastest growing anti-Trinitarian professing Christian constructs world-wide--and yet, they are one of least written about, spoken out against, and thus evangelized non-Christian cults.     Order here 

  See A Concise Look at Oneness Beliefs


Update: T. D. Jakes Changes his Doctrinal Statement

 

 

Oneness advocate and popular TV evangelist T. D. Jakes (of the Potter's House church in Dallas, TX) has changed (reworded) his doctrinal statement regarding God.  

 

 

 

Are Oneness Pentecostals Christian?        

  


 

ALWAYS BEING READY TO MAKE A DEFENSE

In the first century the axiom of the church was: "Contend for the Faith" (Jude 3),   but  regrettably that has  changed. Through the Apostle Peter, God commands all  Christians to always be ready to provide a defense (apologia) and reason (logos) for their faith (cf. 1 Pet. 3:15; Titus 1:9, 13). If Christians do not speak out against false teachings that confuse as well as deny definitive Christian theology, thus deny Christ, the false teachings will be construed as truth. Christian should be able to reasonably and biblically communicate essential Christian doctrines such as the doctrine of the Trinity, the full Deity of Jesus Christ the Son of God and Justification through faith alone.

 

See  The Rise of False Teachings within the Church

                          


The five sola's  

Sola gratia,    Sola Christo,     Sola Fide,     Sola Scripture,      Soli Deo Gloria

Most historically informed Christians should be familiar with the Latin sola’s (sola meaning, “alone”) that were first boldly proclaimed by the Reformers in the early sixteenth century: sola gratia (“grace alone”), solo Christo (“Christ alone”), sola fide (“faith alone”), sola Scriptura (“Scripture alone”), soli Deo Gloria (“to the glory of God alone”), Sola Scriptura simply means: Scripture is sufficient. That is, all truth “necessary” for our salvation and spiritual life are taught either explicitly or implicitly in Scripture

Sola Scriptura (“Scripture alone”) opposes Rome’s view, which asserts that both Scripture and tradition (viz. oral traditions not contained in Scripture) are equally the word of God: “Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honored with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence” (Catechism of the Church, para. 82). “Tradition” as defined by Rome is basically the writings of the early church Fathers. Even though there existed thousands of traditions many upon which were in disagreement among church Fathers (such as the Matt. 16:18 interpretation), Catholics must believe without question (fides implicita) how Rome defines tradition.

Sola gratia (“grace alone”) opposes Rome’s view that justification comes by the grace of God and the meritorious works of man, which includes water-baptism (which Rome calls “the laver of regeneration”), performing the sacraments, good works, and esp. acknowledging all Marian doctrines, which includes religious worship to Mary. 

Sola Fide (“faith alone”) opposes Rome’s view of faith + works. The Council or Trent (1546-63) states categorically:

If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to cooperate in order to the obtaining [of] the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema (Canon 9).

However, in sharp biblical contrast, the very ground of justification is the work of Christ (as seen above) while faith being the very instrument that God uses to justify the sinner. As mentioned, faith is never said to be the cause or ground of justification (lest it would be a “work”), but rather the sole instrument (cf. Rom. 5:1; see chap. 1, note 11).

Solo Christo (“Christ alone”) opposes Rome’s view that the sole work of Christ is not sufficient. For Rome teaches that one must merit his or her justification in addition to the work of Christ. Further, doctrines such as Purgatory deny that Christ totally and perfectly propitiated (appeased) the Father (viz. His sacrifice averted God’s wrath *literally* taking away sin). However, that salvation is through Christ alone does not mean that the Father and the Holy Spirit did not participate in the salvation of the believer. For salvation from start to finish rests on the work of the triune God: God the Holy Spirit regenerates the sinner (cf. Titus 3:5) after which the *gift* of faith is granted by God and then exercised by the sinner as a result of being regenerated (cf. John 1:12-13; Phil. 1:29) after which the Father justifies the sinner (cf. Rom. 8:33) and, through that faith alone, imputing to him or her the righteousness of His Son (cf. Rom. 4:4-8). Christ alone simply means that the sole work and righteousness of Jesus Christ passive (allowing Himself to be crucified) and active (His perfect obedience to the Father) is the very ground of salvation. Thus, salvation is through His righteousness alone. 

Soli Deo Gloria (“to the glory of God alone”) is in light of all the sola’s. Hence, it is by God’s grace alone (not man’s participation) that He saves sinners. We cannot merit any aspect of saving grace (otherwise it would not be grace). By God’s grace alone He us grants saving faith (the alone instrument) in which He instrumentally uses to impute (not infuse or impart) us with the very righteousness of Christ. Thus, it is Christ’s perfect cross-work alone upon which a sinner is justified and the alone instrument being faith. The sole grace of the Triune God infallibly accomplishes salvation from start to finish—therefore, it is the glory of God alone, soli Deo gloria.

Aside from the sola Scriptura was another very important concept: toto Scriptura (all of Scripture). The Reformers, like many of the early church Fathers, followed the apostolic teaching that clearly emphasized: Scripture alone and all of f Scripture should be taught and valued as the Word of God.  In his farewell letter to the elders at Ephesus, Paul declares to them: “Therefore, I testify to you this day that I am innocent of the blood of all men. I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole purpose of God (Acts 20:26-27; Paul may be alluding to Ezek. 33:6). Paul understood the severity of preaching only “parts” of God’s Word or “toning down” what God has said, as many do today. God takes a dim view at pastors and teachers who preach an edited version of the Gospel; dodging judgment and apologetic passages in the Bible—toto Scriptura, that is, all of Scripture must be proclaimed. 

 


   The atoning cross-work of God the Son was not a vague non-specific universal work for which no one is actually (but only    potentially) atoned, but rather it was a *definite atonement and according His perfect *sovereignty and pleasure of His own will (cf. Eph. 1:4-5, 11). 

Therefore, having been justified by faith, 
we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ
 (Rom. 5:1)


Department of Christian Defense
C
opyright:© 2012;  a
ll rights reserved
E & J WebSite Designs